Data Cart

Your data extract

0 variables
0 samples
View Cart
FPNONPUBHOS (V3A00A)
Source of family planning for non-users: Public hospital

Codes and Frequencies



Can't find the category you are looking for? Try the Detailed codes

Description

For women who are not currently using a method of contraception, FPNONPUBHOS (V3A00A) indicates whether, in response to an open-ended question, they reported a public hospital as a source for family planning.

Some samples in the "FPNON" series include categories that can be consolidated into a single response. IPUMS-DHS uses supplemental programming to combine these responses in a standard variable while preserving the separate responses in country-specific variables.

For example, a given sample might include multiple categories for different types of public hospitals that could be combined to create a more comprehensive response category. See Comparability for more information on the specific categories combined in this variable.

Comparability — Index

GENERAL
Bangladesh
Chad
Ghana
Jordan
Madagascar
Mali
Mozambique
Rwanda
Tanzania
Zimbabwe

Comparability

In addition to universe differences, FPNONPUBHOS varies slightly in question wording. Most commonly, this response category is organized under the "Public Sector" header and is worded as "government hospital." However, some countries diverge from this standard convention, and, in some cases, multiple categories were consolidated to form a single, more comprehensive response. Countries of particular interest are noted below.

Comparability - Standard DHS

FPNONPUBHOS (V3A00A) is included in the standard DHS questionnaire for Phase IV forward.

Comparability — Bangladesh [top]

In the 2011 Bangladesh survey, under the "Public Sector" header, there are three separate categories for "medical college hospital," "specialized government hospital," and "district hospital." Because this variable focuses on all public hospitals, these two responses are consolidated in FPNONPUBHOS to create a more comprehensive response category. For researchers interested in preserving these country-specific categories:

  • Medical college hospital is listed as FPNONBD1 in IPUMS-DHS
  • Specialized government hospital is listed as FPNONBD2 in IPUMS-DHS
  • District hospital is listed as FPNONBD3 in IPUMS-DHS

Additionally, in the 2014 Bangladesh survey, there are two separate categories of "medical college hospital" and "district hospital." These responses are consolidated in FPNONPUBHOS and are preserved in FPNONBD1 and FPNONBD3, respectively.

Comparability — Chad [top]

In the 2014 Chad survey, under the "Public Sector" header, there are two separate categories for "government/maternity hospital," and "military hospital." Because this variable focuses on all public hospitals, these two responses are consolidated in FPNONPUBHOS to create a more comprehensive response category. For researchers interested in preserving these country-specific categories:

  • Government/maternity hospital is listed as FPNONTD10 in IPUMS-DHS
  • Military hospital is listed as FPNONTD1 in IPUMS-DHS

Comparability — Ghana [top]

For the 2003, 2008, and 2014 Ghana surveys, FPNONPUBHOS includes government hospitals and government polyclinics in the response category.

Comparability — Jordan [top]

In the 2002, 2007, 2012, and 2017 Jordan surveys, under the "Public Sector" header, there are two separate categories for "government hospital" and "university hospital/clinic." Because this variable focuses on all public hospitals, these two responses are consolidated in FPNONPUBHOS to create a more comprehensive response category. For researchers interested in preserving these country-specific categories:

  • Government hospital is listed as FPNONJO1 in IPUMS-DHS
  • University hospital/clinic is listed as FPNONJO2 in IPUMS-DHS

Comparability — Madagascar [top]

In the 2003 and 2008 Madagascar surveys, under the "Public Sector" header, there are two separate categories for "level I government hospital, CHD-I" and "level II government hospital, CHD-II." Because this variable focuses on all public hospitals, these two responses are consolidated in FPNONPUBHOS to create a more comprehensive response category. For researchers interested in preserving these country-specific categories:

  • CHD-I is listed as FPNONMG1 in IPUMS-DHS
  • CHD-II is listed as FPNONMG2 in IPUMS-DHS

Comparability — Mali [top]

In the 2006 and 2012 Malian surveys, under the "Public Sector" header, there are two separate categories for "national hospital" and "regional hospital." Because this variable focuses on all public hospitals, these two responses are consolidated in FPNONPUBHOS to create a more comprehensive response category. For researchers interested in preserving these country-specific categories:

  • National hospital is listed as FPNONML1 in IPUMS-DHS
  • Regional hospital is listed as FPNONML2 in IPUMS-DHS

Comparability — Mozambique [top]

In the 2011 Mozambican survey, under the "Public Sector" header, there are three separate categories for public hospitals: "central hospital," "rural hospital," and "provincial hospital." Because this variable focuses on all public hospitals, these three responses are consolidated in FPNONPUBHOS to create a more comprehensive response category. For researchers interested in preserving these country-specific categories:

  • Central hospital is listed as FPNONMZ1 in IPUMS-DHS
  • Rural hospital is listed as FPNONMZ2 in IPUMS-DHS
  • Provincial hospital is listed as FPNONMZ3 in IPUMS-DHS

The 2003 Mozambique DHS survey includes both separate public hospital categories and a consolidated category for the different types of public hospitals. Supplemental programming from IPUMS-DHS was therefore not necessary for this sample.

Comparability — Rwanda [top]

In the 2010 and 2014 Rwandan surveys, under the "Public Sector" header, there are two separate categories for "referral hospital" and "district hospital." Because this variable focuses on all public hospitals, these two responses are consolidated in FPNONPUBHOS to create a more comprehensive response category. For researchers interested in preserving these country-specific categories:

  • Referral hospital is listed as FPNONRW1 in IPUMS-DHS
  • District hospital is listed as FPNONRW2 in IPUMS-DHS

Comparability — Tanzania [top]

In the 2010 Tanzanian survey, under the "Public Sector" header, there are three separate categories for public hospitals: "regional hospital," "district hospital," and "referral hospital." Because this variable focuses on all public hospitals, these three responses are consolidated in FPNONPUBHOS to create a more comprehensive response category. For researchers interested in preserving these country-specific categories:

  • Regional hospital is listed as FPNONTZ1 in IPUMS-DHS
  • District hospital is listed as FPNONTZ2 in IPUMS-DHS
  • Referral hospital is listed as FPNONTZ3 in IPUMS-DHS

Comparability — Zimbabwe [top]

For the 2005 and 2010 Zimbabwe surveys, FPNONPUBHOS includes both government hospitals and government clinics in the response category.

Universe

  • Afghanistan 2015: Ever-married women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Bangladesh 2004: Ever-married women age 10-49 who are not currently using a modern method of contraception.
  • Bangladesh 2007: Ever-married women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Bangladesh 2011: Ever-married women age 12-49 who are not currently using a modern method of contraception.
  • Bangladesh 2014: Ever-married women age 15-49 who are not currently using a modern method of contraception.
  • Benin 2001: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception or are using LAM as a contraceptive.
  • Benin 2006: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception or are using LAM or a traditional method as a contraceptive.
  • Benin 2011: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Burkina Faso 2003: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Burkina Faso 2010: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Cameroon 2004: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Cameroon 2011: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Chad 2014: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Congo (Democratic Republic) 2007: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Congo (Democratic Republic) 2013: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Congo Brazzaville 2005: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Congo Brazzaville 2011: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Cote d'Ivoire 2011: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Eswatini (Swaziland) 2006: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a modern method of contraception.
  • Ethiopia 2005: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Ethiopia 2011: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Ghana 2003: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Ghana 2008: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Ghana 2014: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Guinea 2005: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Guinea 2012: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • India 2005: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • India 2015: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception and who have not had a hysterectomy.
  • Jordan 2002: Ever-married women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Jordan 2007: Ever-married women age 15-49 who are not currently using a modern method of contraception.
  • Jordan 2012: Ever-married women age 15-49 who are not currently using a modern method of contraception.
  • Jordan 2017: Ever-married women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Kenya 2003: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Kenya 2008: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Kenya 2014: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception, in households selected for the long questionnaire.
  • Lesotho 2004: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Lesotho 2009: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Lesotho 2014: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Liberia 2007: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Liberia 2013: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Madagascar 2003: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Madagascar 2008: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Malawi 2000: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Malawi 2004: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Malawi 2010: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Mali 2001: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Mali 2006: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Mali 2012: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Morocco 2003: Ever-married women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Mozambique 2003: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Mozambique 2011: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Myanmar 2015: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Namibia 2000: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Namibia 2006: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Namibia 2013: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Nepal 2001: Ever-married women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Nepal 2006: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a modern method of contraception.
  • Nepal 2011: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception and who have not had a hysterectomy.
  • Niger 2006: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Nigeria 2003: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Nigeria 2008: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Nigeria 2013: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Pakistan 2006: Ever-married women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Pakistan 2012: Ever-married women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Rwanda 2005: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Rwanda 2010: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Rwanda 2014: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Senegal 2005: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Senegal 2010: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Senegal 2012: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Senegal 2014: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Senegal 2015: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Senegal 2016: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Senegal 2017: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Tanzania 2004: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Tanzania 2010: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Togo 2013: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Uganda 2001: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception or who did received contraceptive from a friend, relative, or "other" source.
  • Uganda 2006: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Uganda 2011: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Yemen 2013: Ever-married women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Zambia 2001: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Zambia 2007: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Zambia 2013: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Zimbabwe 2005: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Zimbabwe 2010: Women age 15-49 who are not currently using a method of contraception.
  • Afghanistan: 2015-C, 2015-W, 2015-B, 2015-W
  • Bangladesh: 2004-W, 2004-W, 2004-B, 2004-C, 2007-W, 2007-W, 2007-B, 2007-C, 2011-W, 2011-C, 2011-B, 2014-B, 2014-C, 2014-W
  • Benin: 2001-W, 2001-C, 2001-B, 2006-W, 2006-B, 2006-C, 2006-W, 2011-B, 2011-C, 2011-W, 2011-W
  • Burkina Faso: 2003-W, 2003-B, 2003-C, 2003-W, 2010-W, 2010-B, 2010-C, 2010-W
  • Cameroon: 2004-B, 2004-C, 2004-W, 2011-C, 2011-B, 2011-W
  • Chad: 2014-W, 2014-C, 2014-B
  • Congo (Democratic Republic): 2007-W, 2007-C, 2007-B, 2013-W, 2013-C, 2013-B
  • Congo Brazzaville: 2005-W, 2005-C, 2005-B, 2011-W, 2011-C, 2011-B
  • Cote d'Ivoire: 2011-W, 2011-C, 2011-B
  • Eswatini (Swaziland): 2006-W, 2006-C, 2006-B, 2006-W
  • Ethiopia: 2005-W, 2005-W, 2005-B, 2005-C, 2011-C, 2011-B, 2011-W, 2011-W
  • Ghana: 2003-C, 2003-W, 2003-B, 2003-W, 2008-B, 2008-W, 2008-W, 2008-C, 2014-W, 2014-B, 2014-C, 2014-W
  • Guinea: 2005-W, 2005-W, 2005-C, 2005-B, 2012-B, 2012-C, 2012-W
  • India: 2005-C, 2005-B, 2005-W, 2005-W, 2015-W, 2015-C, 2015-B, 2015-W
  • Jordan: 2002-C, 2002-B, 2002-W, 2007-C, 2007-B, 2007-W, 2012-W, 2012-B, 2012-C, 2017-W, 2017-C, 2017-B
  • Kenya: 2003-C, 2003-W, 2003-B, 2003-W, 2008-W, 2008-B, 2008-C, 2008-W, 2014-B, 2014-C, 2014-W, 2014-W
  • Lesotho: 2004-C, 2004-B, 2004-W, 2009-W, 2009-C, 2009-B, 2009-W, 2014-W, 2014-B, 2014-C, 2014-W
  • Liberia: 2007-W, 2007-C, 2007-B, 2013-W, 2013-C, 2013-B, 2013-W
  • Madagascar: 2003-B, 2003-C, 2003-W, 2008-B, 2008-C, 2008-W
  • Malawi: 2000-W, 2000-W, 2000-B, 2000-C, 2004-B, 2004-W, 2004-C, 2004-W, 2010-B, 2010-C, 2010-W, 2010-W
  • Mali: 2001-W, 2001-W, 2001-C, 2001-B, 2006-B, 2006-C, 2006-W, 2012-W, 2012-C, 2012-B
  • Morocco: 2003-W, 2003-C, 2003-B, 2003-W
  • Mozambique: 2003-W, 2003-C, 2003-W, 2003-B, 2011-B, 2011-C, 2011-W
  • Myanmar: 2015-C, 2015-W, 2015-B, 2015-W
  • Namibia: 2000-W, 2000-C, 2000-B, 2006-B, 2006-W, 2006-C, 2006-W, 2013-B, 2013-C, 2013-W, 2013-W
  • Nepal: 2001-W, 2001-B, 2001-C, 2006-C, 2006-B, 2006-W, 2006-W, 2011-C, 2011-B, 2011-W, 2011-W
  • Niger: 2006-W, 2006-B, 2006-C, 2006-W
  • Nigeria: 2003-C, 2003-B, 2003-W, 2008-W, 2008-B, 2008-C, 2008-W, 2013-B, 2013-C, 2013-W, 2013-W
  • Pakistan: 2006-W, 2006-B, 2006-C, 2012-B, 2012-C, 2012-W, 2012-W
  • Rwanda: 2005-W, 2005-W, 2005-B, 2005-C, 2010-B, 2010-C, 2010-W, 2014-B, 2014-W, 2014-C
  • Senegal: 2005-C, 2005-W, 2005-B, 2005-W, 2010-W, 2010-W, 2010-B, 2010-C, 2012-W, 2012-B, 2012-C, 2012-W, 2014-B, 2014-W, 2014-C, 2014-W, 2015-W, 2015-B, 2015-W, 2015-C, 2016-B, 2016-C, 2016-W, 2016-W, 2017-W, 2017-C, 2017-B, 2017-W
  • Tanzania: 2004-C, 2004-B, 2004-W, 2004-W, 2010-B, 2010-C, 2010-W
  • Togo: 2013-W, 2013-C, 2013-B
  • Uganda: 2001-W, 2001-B, 2001-C, 2001-W, 2006-B, 2006-C, 2006-W, 2006-W, 2011-W, 2011-C, 2011-W, 2011-B
  • Yemen: 2013-W, 2013-C, 2013-B, 2013-W
  • Zambia: 2001-B, 2001-W, 2001-C, 2007-B, 2007-W, 2007-W, 2007-C, 2013-W, 2013-B, 2013-C, 2013-W
  • Zimbabwe: 2005-C, 2005-B, 2005-W, 2005-W, 2010-C, 2010-W, 2010-W, 2010-B